According to the AECOM study "the complex generated a net income of approximately $430,000 and $860,000 in 2012 and 2013." [p. 30]
I don't suppose a comparison has been made about this, but I'm wondering what the difference in income to the city would be between the civic center fixed up to ADA standards as opposed to the expanded version. In other words, would we be better or worse off, just as far as actual civic center income, with one or the other? Or is this farther in the AECOM report, since I'm only on page 30?
No comments:
Post a Comment