http://chiefsview.com/2015/04/16/lets-talk-about-the-civic-center-expansion/
"I believe that if the Civic Center expansion would have passed the
public vote, it would have been a successful endeavor. I also believe
that there were many errors made during the planning process, public
information process and marketing campaign. Overall, no one in their
right mind could have expected a majority of Rapid City residents to
accept the expansion plan after being kept in the dark for over three
years. Plus, $180 million is too much money.
While the $180 million Civic Center expansion project was the most
expensive purchase proposal in the history of Rapid City, Mayor Kooiker
sought to shield himself throughout the entire process. There are people
in Rapid City who voted for Sam Kooiker because he promised to protect
them from big government. There are also people who voted for him
because he promised economic development. Ironically, when you try to
play both sides of the coin, you can’t win.
Unfortunately, during this massive failure, the City spent $700,000
for studies and design and we are no further ahead on this issue than we
were three years ago. In fact, the City has taking a giant step
backward, if the original intent was to merely bring the Civic Center
Arena into ADA compliance. One thing is for certain: we now have a
legal, binding agreement
with the federal government to bring the Don Barnett Arena into
compliance with ADA codes. Tens of millions of dollars will be spent
doing so, and in the end, we will have the same Civic Center arena we
have today. Is this progress?"
Rapid City's Civic Center is in need of upgrades to conform to the ADA. The city's solution to spend $180 million to add onto the center rather than just fix the deficiencies was shot down in the March 10 public vote. Now a simpler less extravagant plan is called for.
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Facts about the civic center expansion vote
http://rapidcityjournal.com/now/today/rcj/facts-on-the-failed-million-civic-center-expansion/collection_eaee458e-d492-11e4-b164-b3e858f99242.html
1. Almost 13,000 voters
2. costliest proposed project ever
3. "last stand-alone special election"
4. 1 of 14 districts voted in favor
5. only 1 voter in Seeger district voted in favor.
1. Almost 13,000 voters
2. costliest proposed project ever
3. "last stand-alone special election"
4. 1 of 14 districts voted in favor
5. only 1 voter in Seeger district voted in favor.
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Sasso; time for a survey
http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/opinion/sasso-what-s-next-for-city-s-civic-center/article_1e3e0f35-d771-5840-974a-bc91af691ef0.html
"How do we get more people involved? I believe Rapid City should invest in an online survey. A popular service such as Survey Monkey would likely cost less than $2,000 to implement.
An online survey would be much cheaper than mailing surveys that wouldn’t be returned. It would make sense to have both short and longer surveys with the key questions up front.
The survey could include general questions about infrastructure and the Vision Fund dollars. What do people think about those? I know some people voted “no” because they don’t like the location, the parking or that teachers aren’t being paid enough (which is a completely separate pot of money).
Most people have access to a computer. If not, computers are always available at the library."
A survey sounds like a great idea. But I think both sides want the ADA problems fixed, and at least some tweaking of the center. How much to spend? That's tricky.
"How do we get more people involved? I believe Rapid City should invest in an online survey. A popular service such as Survey Monkey would likely cost less than $2,000 to implement.
An online survey would be much cheaper than mailing surveys that wouldn’t be returned. It would make sense to have both short and longer surveys with the key questions up front.
The survey could include general questions about infrastructure and the Vision Fund dollars. What do people think about those? I know some people voted “no” because they don’t like the location, the parking or that teachers aren’t being paid enough (which is a completely separate pot of money).
Most people have access to a computer. If not, computers are always available at the library."
A survey sounds like a great idea. But I think both sides want the ADA problems fixed, and at least some tweaking of the center. How much to spend? That's tricky.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)